Acts 26

Acts 26 records the apostle Paul’s defense before King Agrippa, where Paul recounts his past persecution of Christians, his dramatic encounter with Jesus, his divine commission to preach the gospel, and his plea for Agrippa to accept Christ. The chapter ends with Agrippa acknowledging that Paul has done nothing deserving death and hints that Paul could have been freed if he had not appealed to Caesar.

Key points in Acts 26 include:

  • Paul’s defense and testimony (Acts 26:1-21): Paul begins by establishing rapport and recounts his background as a Pharisee who zealously persecuted Christians. He describes his encounter with the risen Jesus on the road to Damascus and his commission to preach repentance and forgiveness to Jews and Gentiles alike.

  • Paul’s gospel preaching and challenge to Agrippa (Acts 26:22-29): Paul explains that his message aligns with the Jewish prophets and the hope of resurrection. He confronts King Agrippa directly, asking if he believes the prophets, implying that belief in prophecy should lead to acceptance of Jesus. Agrippa responds by saying Paul nearly persuades him to become a Christian, and Paul expresses his wish that all listeners might become like him spiritually, except for his chains.

  • Festus’ interruption and reaction (Acts 26:24-25): When Paul speaks about the resurrection, Festus accuses him of madness, but Paul calmly defends the reasonableness and truth of his message.

  • The verdict and conclusion (Acts 26:30-32): After Paul’s defense, Agrippa, Festus, and others privately agree that Paul is innocent of charges warranting death or imprisonment. Agrippa notes Paul could have been released if he had not appealed to Caesar.

Additional insights:

  • The setting involves King Agrippa in royal robes, his sister Bernice adorned with jewels, and many prominent officials, highlighting the political and social significance of Paul’s defense.

  • Paul’s appeal to Agrippa is strategically framed by referencing Agrippa’s knowledge of the Jewish prophets, connecting the gospel to existing scriptural beliefs to encourage acceptance.

  • Paul exemplifies respectful and reasoned discourse, responding politely to Festus’ accusation rather than defensively, emphasizing integrity and soundness in apologetics.

  • Paul’s testimony affirms the necessity of repentance and obedience as the correct responses to God’s revelation (Acts 26:19-20, 27-29).

Overall, Acts 26 is a pivotal chapter illustrating Paul’s bold witness before rulers, his sincere plea for repentance, and the mixed reception of the gospel message.

Popular posts from this blog

Romans 4

Romans chapter 4 teaches that Abraham was declared righteous by God because of his faith, not by works or obedience to the law, including circumcision . Paul uses Abraham as the prime example to show that justification—being made right before God—comes through faith alone, which is a gift from God and not earned by human effort. Key points in Romans 4 include: Abraham believed God, and that belief was counted to him as righteousness (Romans 4:3, referencing Genesis 15:6). If Abraham had been justified by works, he would have had something to boast about, but justification is by faith, not works (Romans 4:2, 4–5). Paul anticipates a Jewish objection that Abraham was made righteous through circumcision (a work), but counters that Abraham was declared righteous before he was circumcised, making circumcision a sign or seal of the righteousness that was already credited to him (Romans 4:9–12). Abraham became a spiritual father not only to Jews but also to Gentiles who believe by faith...
Read more